🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an international accord designed to protect women from abuse, covering family violence, following extensive and intense discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators gathered in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate decision now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to develop laws and support services to end all types of violence.

Latvia has become the initial EU country to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a move that human rights organizations described as a major regression for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have contended that its focus on equal rights undermines traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Saeima, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a action sponsored by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary political groups advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose head has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

The nation's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be made political, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent vote has provoked broad protest both within the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a Latvian appeal demanding the convention to be maintained. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a protest for next Thursday, charging MPs of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Worries and Potential Future Actions

The head of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a rash choice driven by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey left the convention four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority support, the head of state could possibly send back the bill for additional consideration if he has concerns.

Head of State the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal requirements, "taking into account state and legal considerations, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout the continent," commented a rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in several European nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could affect comparable discussions in other member states