🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 stands as among the most fatal – and consequential – dates during three decades of unrest in Northern Ireland.

Throughout the area where events unfolded – the legacy of that fateful day are painted on the walls and embedded in public consciousness.

A protest demonstration was held on a cold but bright afternoon in the city.

The protest was a protest against the practice of detention without trial – holding suspects without legal proceedings – which had been implemented in response to an extended period of unrest.

Military personnel from the Parachute Regiment shot dead multiple civilians in the neighborhood – which was, and remains, a strongly Irish nationalist area.

A specific visual became notably memorable.

Photographs showed a clergyman, the priest, using a blood-stained cloth in his effort to protect a assembly moving a young man, the injured teenager, who had been fatally wounded.

Media personnel captured considerable film on the day.

Historical records contains Father Daly informing a media representative that soldiers "appeared to fire in all directions" and he was "absolutely certain" that there was no reason for the shooting.

The narrative of events was rejected by the initial investigation.

The Widgery Tribunal concluded the soldiers had been shot at first.

During the negotiation period, the administration established another inquiry, after campaigning by surviving kin, who said the initial inquiry had been a cover-up.

That year, the conclusion by the investigation said that overall, the paratroopers had fired first and that zero among the victims had posed any threat.

The contemporary head of state, the leader, apologised in the Parliament – saying fatalities were "without justification and unacceptable."

Law enforcement commenced look into the incident.

A military veteran, known as Soldier F, was charged for homicide.

Indictments were filed over the deaths of the first individual, twenty-two, and twenty-six-year-old the second individual.

The defendant was additionally charged of attempting to murder Patrick O'Donnell, additional persons, further individuals, Michael Quinn, and an unknown person.

There is a judicial decision maintaining the defendant's privacy, which his legal team have argued is required because he is at danger.

He stated to the investigation that he had solely shot at persons who were armed.

This assertion was rejected in the official findings.

Information from the examination would not be used straightforwardly as testimony in the court case.

In the dock, the veteran was shielded from sight behind a privacy screen.

He spoke for the initial occasion in court at a session in that month, to respond "not responsible" when the allegations were read.

Kin of the deceased on Bloody Sunday journeyed from Londonderry to the courthouse daily of the proceedings.

A family member, whose sibling was killed, said they understood that hearing the proceedings would be painful.

"I can see the events in my mind's eye," he said, as we examined the key areas mentioned in the proceedings – from the street, where his brother was fatally wounded, to the adjoining the courtyard, where one victim and another victim were fatally wounded.

"It even takes me back to where I was that day.

"I assisted with my brother and place him in the medical transport.

"I experienced again each detail during the evidence.

"Notwithstanding enduring everything – it's still meaningful for me."